Orthodontic emergencies and mental health of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire study.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on orthodontic treatment and mental health of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment and to compare their mental health with the age-matched control group. Materials and methods: 484 orthodontic patients (245 males and 239 females) and 200 age-matched control subjects were divided into two age groups. Group 1 had 14-18 years of adolescents (N = 274) and 100 control participants (Group 2) and Group 3 comprised of 19 years above adults (N = 210) and 100 control participants (Group 4). Group 1 and 3 patients filled the 4 sections of the questionnaire related to orthodontic emergencies (Sections 1-3) and mental distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-Section 4), while groups 2 and 4 were asked to fill only Section-4. The comparison of mental distress on high/low Kessler scores was made using the Chi-Square test/Fisher's exact test. The factors which came out to be significant were put to bivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The percentage of patients with high Kessler scores among Group 1 and Group 3 were 9.9% and 17.2% respectively, and their differences with age-matched control groups were non-significant. The mean differences of Kessler score were significantly higher for Group 3 compared to group 1. The higher Kessler score was associated with age, higher education, a feeling of concern for non-availability of appointments, increased treatment duration, its effect on the quality of treatment, and sabotaging of definitive future plans. Conclusions: The orthodontic treatment and emergencies may not be a significant factor contributing to increased stress among patients during the lockdown.

Prospective evaluation of thoracic diseases using a compact flat-panel detector spiral computed tomographic scanner.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of a compact flat-panel detector (FD) scanner for thoracic diseases compared to a clinical CT scanner. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this single-center prospective study, and all participants provided informed consent. From December 2020 to May 2021, 30 patients (mean age, 67.1 ± 8.3 years) underwent two same-day low-dose chest CT scans using clinical state-of-art and compact FDCT scanners. Image quality was assessed visually and quantitatively. Two readers evaluated the diagnostic performance for nodules, parenchymal opacifications, bronchiectasis, linear opacities, and pleural abnormalities in 40 paired CT scans. The other 20 paired CT scans were used to examine the agreement of semi-quantitative CT scoring regarding bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis, nodules, airspace consolidations, and cavities. Results: FDCT images had significantly lower visual image quality than clinical CT images (all p < 0.001). The two CT image sets showed no significant differences in signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (56.8 ± 12.5 vs. 57.3 ± 15.2; p = 0.985 and 62.9 ± 11.7 vs. 60.7 ± 16.9; p = 0.615). The pooled sensitivity was comparable for nodules, parenchymal opacifications, linear opacities, and pleural abnormalities (p = 0.065-0.625), whereas the sensitivity was significantly lower in FDCT images than in clinical CT images for micronodules (p = 0.007) and bronchiectasis (p = 0.004). The specificity was mostly 1.0. Semi-quantitative CT scores were similar between the CT image sets (p > 0.05), and intraclass correlation coefficients were around 0.950 or higher, except for bronchiectasis (0.869). Conclusion: Compact FDCT images provided lower image quality but comparable diagnostic performance to clinical CT images for nodules, parenchymal opacifications, linear opacities, and pleural abnormalities.

Comparison of temporal evolution of computed tomography imaging features in COVID-19 and influenza infections in a multicenter cohort study.

Purpose: To compare temporal evolution of imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza in computed tomography and evaluate their predictive value for distinction. Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study 179 CT examinations of 52 COVID-19 and 44 influenza critically ill patients were included. Lung involvement, main pattern (ground glass opacity, crazy paving, consolidation) and additional lung and chest findings were evaluated by two independent observers. Additional findings and clinical data were compared patient-wise. A decision tree analysis was performed to identify imaging features with predictive value in distinguishing both entities. Results: In contrast to influenza patients, lung involvement remains high in COVID-19 patients > 14 days after the diagnosis. The predominant pattern in COVID-19 evolves from ground glass at the beginning to consolidation in later disease. In influenza there is more consolidation at the beginning and overall less ground glass opacity (p = 0.002). Decision tree analysis yielded the following: Earlier in disease course, pleural effusion is a typical feature of influenza (p = 0.007) whereas ground glass opacities indicate COVID-19 (p = 0.04). In later disease, particularly more lung involvement (p < 0.001), but also less pleural (p = 0.005) and pericardial (p = 0.003) effusion favor COVID-19 over influenza. Regardless of time point, less lung involvement (p < 0.001), tree-in-bud (p = 0.002) and pericardial effusion (p = 0.01) make influenza more likely than COVID-19. Conclusions: This study identified differences in temporal evolution of imaging features between COVID-19 and influenza. These findings may help to distinguish both diseases in critically ill patients when laboratory findings are delayed or inconclusive.

Laura maria franciosi, the time in international contracts

The article deals with the role of time in international contracts, focusing in particular on (i) Article 39(1) CISG providing for the duty of the buyer to give notice of a lack of conformity of the goods with-in a ‘reasonable time’;(ii) the new ICC Arbitral Expedited Procedure, and (iii) the effects of Covid-19 and the related governmental provi-sions aiming at preventing its dissemination on certain time-related aspects of international contracts. © 2021, Mucchi Editore. All rights reserved.

Reliability of Virtual Physical Performance Assessments in Veterans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of 3 physical performance tests performed via a telehealth visit (30-s arm curls test, 30-s chair stand test, 2-min step test) among community-dwelling older veterans. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: Virtual. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans (N=55; mean age 75y) who enrolled in Gerofit, a virtual group exercise program. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were tested by 2 different assessors at 1 time point. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals and Bland-Altman plots were used as measures of reliability. To assess generalizability, ICCs were further evaluated by health conditions (type 2 diabetes, arthritis, obesity, depression). RESULTS: Assessments were conducted among 55 participants. The ICC was above 0.98 for all 3 tests across health conditions and Bland-Altman plots indicated that there were no significant systematic errors in the measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual physical performance measures appear to have high reliability and the findings are generalizable across health conditions among veterans. Thus, they are reliable for evaluating physical performance in older veterans in virtual settings.

The Therapeutic Potential of Galectin-3 in the Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients and Those Compromised With COVID-19.

The novel coronavirus pneumonia COVID-19 is characterized by all age susceptibility, which imposes a dramatic threat to the human species all over the world. According to current available data, the cytokine storm appears to be the most life-threatening symptom of severe COVID-19 cases accompanied with lung fibrosis. Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a member of soluble ß-galactoside-binding lectin families, has been implicated as a key regulator in various inflammation conditions in addition to its well-documented roles in cancer. The pro-inflammatory activity of Gal-3 in the inflammatory response and lung fibrosis of COVID-19 has been proposed by emerging studies, which suggested that inhibition of Gal-3 may represent a novel treatment approach for COVID-19 patients. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. ICC accounts for 10-25% of primary liver cancers with limited therapeutic options, which has higher incidence in Asian countries, particularly in China. Cancer patients, including ICC patients, are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 due to their impaired immune system. It is thus undoubtedly a challenge for our oncology department to establish effective treatment strategies under the influence of the COVID-19 crisis. According to our management procedures in the COVID-19 era, emergency treatment will be applied to ICC patients who are under life-threatening conditions, despite the COVID-19 infection. To the best of our knowledge, the modulatory function of Gal-3 in ICC is still barely explored to date. In order to evaluate the therapeutic potential of Gal-3 for ICC patients or those comprised with COVID-19, we herein report our preliminary investigation into roles of Gal-3 in ICC. Our results exhibited that the expression of Gal-3 was significantly up-regulated in ICC tissues, and a significant correlation was observed between its overexpression and malignant progression of ICC cells. We further discussed the activity and possible molecular mechanisms of Gal-3 in ICC, which may pave the ways for further exploring the possibility of Gal-3 as a potential therapeutic target for treating ICC patients or those with COVID-19-related conditions.

Understanding the role of left and right ventricular strain assessment in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause cardiac injury resulting in abnormal right or left ventricular function (RV/LV) with worse outcomes. We hypothesized that two-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking assessment of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV free wall strain (FWS) by transthoracic echocardiography can assist as markers for subclinical cardiac injury predicting increased mortality. METHODS: We performed 2D strain analysis via proprietary software in 48 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Clinical information, demographics, comorbidities, and lab values were collected via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality based on an optimized abnormal LV GLS value via ROC analysis and RV FWS. RESULTS: The optimal LV GLS cutoff to predict death was -13.8%, with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 55-98%) and specificity of 54% (95% CI 36-71%). Abnormal LV GLS >-13.8% was associated with a higher risk of death [unadjusted hazard ratio 5.15 (95% CI 1.13-23.45), p = 0.034], which persisted after adjustment for clinical variables. Among patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >50%, those with LV GLS > -13.8% had higher mortality compared to those with LV GLS <-13.8% (41% vs. 10%, p = 0.030). RV FWS value was higher in patients with LV GLS >-13.8% (-13.7 ±â€¯5.9 vs. -19.6 ±â€¯6.7, p = 0.003), but not associated with decreased survival. CONCLUSION: Abnormal LV strain with a cutoff of >-13.8% in patients with COVID-19 is associated with significantly higher risk of death. Despite normal LVEF, abnormal LV GLS predicted worse outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. There was no mortality difference based on RV strain.

SARS-CoV-2 in environmental perspective: Occurrence, persistence, surveillance, inactivation and challenges.

The unprecedented global spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is depicting the distressing pandemic consequence on human health, economy as well as ecosystem services. So far novel coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks were associated with SARS-CoV-2 (2019), middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV, 2012), and SARS-CoV-1 (2003) events. CoV relates to the enveloped family of Betacoronavirus (ßCoV) with positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA). Knowing well the persistence, transmission, and spread of SARS-CoV-2 through proximity, the faecal-oral route is now emerging as a major environmental concern to community transmission. The replication and persistence of CoV in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and shedding through stools is indicating a potential transmission route to the environment settings. Despite of the evidence, based on fewer reports on SARS-CoV-2 occurrence and persistence in wastewater/sewage/water, the transmission of the infective virus to the community is yet to be established. In this realm, this communication attempted to review the possible influx route of the enteric enveloped viral transmission in the environmental settings with reference to its occurrence, persistence, detection, and inactivation based on the published literature so far. The possibilities of airborne transmission through enteric virus-laden aerosols, environmental factors that may influence the viral transmission, and disinfection methods (conventional and emerging) as well as the inactivation mechanism with reference to the enveloped virus were reviewed. The need for wastewater epidemiology (WBE) studies for surveillance as well as for early warning signal was elaborated. This communication will provide a basis to understand the SARS-CoV-2 as well as other viruses in the context of the environmental engineering perspective to design effective strategies to counter the enteric virus transmission and also serves as a working paper for researchers, policy makers and regulators.